air quality monitoring citizen scienceCitizen Science Environment SciStarter Blog 

Regular People Are Changing How We Monitor Air Quality

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Low cost, high impact: How access to sensors is changing everything in air quality research.  

Air quality: It’s about us

The ways we hear about air pollution can make us think it’s not about us. Large industrial stacks, smoky skies, and cities far away — filled with people we’ve never met, in places we don’t expect to be. Articles on the front pages of major news outlets describe air pollution in India, China, and Bangladesh, and they don’t always make the connection with people like me who live in the United States. After all, our air quality is good. Right?  

Not according to the American Lung Association. In their “State of the Air 2019” report, they estimated that 43.3% of Americans (141.1 million people) live in counties where air quality doesn’t meet health standards. Worse, communities of color bear a disproportionate burden of these air quality problems. (Tessum et al). In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates over 100,000 people die each year due to complications from just a single type of air pollutant (particulate matter, or soot), costing us all $886 billion annually. That’s also more than double the mortality rate of breast cancer. 

Air (E) quality

The data collected in these studies came from crucial air quality measurements captured, in part, by the EPA’s AirNow network. It’s a large network of regulatory monitors required by the Clean Air Act. Unfortunately, these monitors can be few and far between in some places, and often one local measurement becomes a stand-in for air quality over large areas. In North Carolina, there are only 23 monitors for particulate matter, accounting for 100 diverse counties that stretch from the highest point in the Appalachian mountains to the gorgeous barrier islands. In fact, we’ve actually been losing monitors in the last few years.

The power of crowdsourcing

Citizen science data — data collected by regular people volunteering their time — is extremely valuable, allowing us to go far beyond broad institutional inferences about local air quality. For instance, hyperlocal levels of air pollution can guide policy for issues like school busing, thus reducing students’ exposure to harmful air pollution. More monitoring locations can assist in wildfire smoke detection and provide alerts for residents near wildland areas, which might be burned on purpose to reduce risk. For example, sensors can ground-truth NASA satellites collecting aerosol and climate data, thus informing hospital resource allocation when pollution spikes might increase emergency department visits for asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Air quality monitoring: Ron Ross, the President of Northwood Estates Community Organization, with the AirBeam PM2.5 sensor that he and other neighborhood residents used to measure pollution in their neighborhoods. (Credit: Clean Air Carolina)
Ron Ross, the President of Northwood Estates Community Organization, with the AirBeam PM2.5 sensor that he and other neighborhood residents used to measure pollution in their neighborhoods. (Credit: Clean Air Carolina)

What’s next?

The latest wave of “low-cost sensors” are affordable, real-time, web-connected devices that measure air pollution and are designed for simplicity and scale. Thousands of the sensors are being deployed all over the world to tackle hyperlocal air quality, environmental justice, occupational health, and land use policy challenges. The best part? They’re being deployed by all of us: members of communities, families, schools, and non-scientists and scientists alike. The democratization of data and the SciStarter spirit has given us powerful tools for describing the world in ways we didn’t think was possible even ten years ago.

Community-based science is disrupting one of the most important scientific fields of public health in the developed world. People everywhere are taking control of the information that can change their lives, and shedding light on issues like never before. That’s why my organization began working with Charlotte neighborhood leaders to map out air quality and identify areas of concern using AirBeam sensors from Habitatmap, a non-profit environmental health justice organization based out of New York.  With the help of their HabitatMap and AirCasting websites, volunteers were able to improve our understanding of environmental concerns in their area.  Data collected by residents in the homes, students and their schools, and researchers in their work would all be housed in the same place, free to the public.  

Buyer beware, though; not all sensors are created equal, and not all “crowdsourcing” is really “citizen science.”  Data is only valuable when it is put to use. In some cases sensor manufacturers are provided cloud-based storage and mapping abilities to share data, but unless there is an application or research question designed for use of the data, then it will likely go unnoticed.  

No matter where the technology goes, there will always be people who must interact with it, who decide what to do with it, and who are impacted by it.  That’s why I always say, the most important part of crowdsourcing is the crowd.

Monitoring air quality as a community: The very first AirKeepers Citizen Science event held in Uptown Charlotte in July 2016. AirBeams were used to canvas the city in each ward, and on multiple modes of transport. After, the volunteers mapped the data and shared pizza. (Credit: Clean Air Carolina)
The very first AirKeepers Citizen Science event held in Uptown Charlotte in July 2016. AirBeams were used to canvas the city in each ward, and on multiple modes of transport. After, the volunteers mapped the data and shared pizza. (Credit: Clean Air Carolina)

Now is the time to find a project that you can take part in and join the movement!  

This blog post is the first in a new series from Calvin Cupini, the citizen science manager at Clean Air Carolina. 

References

Desantis, C., Siegel, R., Bandi, P., & Jemal, A. (2011). Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians61(6), 408–418. doi: 10.3322/caac.20134

Goodkind, A. L., Tessum, C. W., Coggins, J. S., Hill, J. D., & Marshall, J. D. (2019). Fine-scale damage estimates of particulate matter air pollution reveal opportunities for location-specific mitigation of emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(18), 8775–8780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816102116

Tessum, C. W., Apte, J. S., Goodkind, A. L., Muller, N. Z., Mullins, K. A., Paolella, D. A., … Hill, J. D. (2019). Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(13), 6001–6006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818859116

About the Author

Calvin Cupini

At Clean Air Carolina, Calvin reports on localized pollution impacts in environmental justice areas, manages and implements the AirKeeper network of engaged citizens, and advises staff in matters of public science and environmental economics. He is currently installing a statewide particle sensor network in every single county of North Carolina. Calvin studied Environmental Science and Economics at UNC Charlotte with a focus on GIS and spatial modeling. His research included cost-benefit modeling of energy technology and policies, and the economic effects of light rail development on housing prices. Calvin’s more recent scientific focus includes a low cost air quality monitor study on fine particle pollution and low cost monitoring tools, as well as GIS modeling of solar power feasibility and land cover land use change.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Read This