By Shayna Keyles (@shaynakeyles).
If you have been following GotScience.org for a while, you have probably seen the term citizen science, but you may still be unfamiliar with what that means. Consider this article a bit of Citizen Science 101.
Citizen science describes a collaborative scientific process in which non-scientists, or citizen scientists, collaborate with scientists, who are trained professionals, often with a postgraduate degree, employed in a scientific field. Citizen scientists may have received science education or have participated in research, but they are not employed as scientists.
Citizen science programs are active in many disciplines, such as astronomy, physics, biochemistry, neuroscience, and more. A simple web search for a citizen science project in any of these fields will yield countless results, as these types of projects have become more popular over the past decade, in countries across the globe.
Why Is Citizen Science Important?
Citizen science is changing the scientific landscape for both the scientific community and the greater public. It can be classified into one of three types: (1) contributive, where citizens gather data; (2) collaborative, where citizens may also analyze or interpret this data; or (3) co-created, where citizens participate in all levels of a project, from designing the research question to analyzing data.
Contributive and collaborative citizen science allows experiments, explorations, or inquiries to run on a large-scale, ongoing basis, which provides scientists with large and diverse data sets that might have been otherwise unavailable. (While it is true that many research projects take place over long periods even without citizen science participation, the large-scale volunteer efforts of citizen scientists allow rapid scaling for relatively little capital.) Additionally, it provides opportunity for two-way engagement between the public and scientists, which can lead to increased topical literacy in participants and has the capacity to influence policy and decision-making at a range of scales, including, for example, conservation efforts.
Citizen Science Educates the Public
Data suggests that participation in citizen science helps improve literacy and understanding among members of the public. In many cases, participants come away with a greater appreciation and understanding of the scientific process and deepened knowledge of the topic they are researching. However, there is no evidence that citizen science participants improve in all areas of science; their knowledge gains may be limited to the areas of research they participated in. Still, members of the public who participate in a citizen science project report higher confidence in their abilities than those who had not previously participated and a higher willingness to participate in future projects.
The process can be unexpectedly accessible for individuals without a scientific background, as long as they have the time or the tools. For example, a bioblitz may require no more than an hour of a person’s time at a designated site, and an ID app such as iNaturalist requires nothing more than access to a phone. Many conservation projects are observation-based and available through phone apps, including NASA’s GLOBE Observer and Mosquito Habitat Mapper, PlantNet, the entire Zooniverse suite, and eBird.
Citizen Science Informs Research and Policy
Scientists also benefit greatly from the contributions of citizen scientists. A citizen science network enables researchers to view and utilize data from myriad subjects in locations across the world, all at once. This is perhaps one of the greatest benefits of citizen science: not only do citizen scientists provide usable data, but they can analyze it, too. This is great help for scientists, who often find it unfeasible to collect and analyze such large data sets on their own due to time and resource constraints.
Citizen science can benefit whole societies and communities as well. The results of research gained through citizen science projects have been used to inform local policies, enhance formal and informal education initiatives, conserve natural resources, and support environmental sustainability.
To learn more about citizen science, we highly recommend reading about the work of the European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), a multinational organization that researches, advocates, and enhances the connection between science and public policy. If you are interested in participating in a citizen science project, we recommend visiting SciStarter.com to find a large database of ongoing projects.
This article has been adapted from Citizen Science: A Tool for Conservation, a white paper published by Science Connected.
—Shayna Keyles is a staff writer and publicist for GotScience.org, a non-fiction editor, and an explorer of all things.
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
Chatzigeorgiou, G., Faulwetter, S., Dailianis, T., Smith, V. S., Koulouri, P., Dounas, C., & Arvanitidis, C. (2016). Testing the robustness of citizen science projects: Evaluating the results of pilot project COMBER. Biodiversity Data Journal, 4, e10859. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10859
Cronje, R, Rohlinger, S., Crall, A. & Newman, G. (2011). Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? a study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 10, 135–145. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611
Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLOS ONE, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687
Keyles, S. (2018). Citizen science: A tool for conservation. Science Connected.
Lewandowski, E., Caldwell, W., Elmquist, D., & Oberhauser, K. (2017). Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 3. doi: http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.77
Pocock, M. J. O., Tweddle, J. C., Savage, J., Robinson, J. D., & Roy, H. E. (2017). The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PLOS ONE, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172579
GotScience Magazine is published by the nonprofit Science Connected, is made possible by donations from readers like you. You can support open-access science news – and it only takes a minute. Donate now.